WebJan 23, 2024 · Bliss Sequoia obtained coverage on the water park’s behalf with an overall limit of $5 million. A little over a year after the policy was secured, a six year old boy suffered a near drowning accident at the water park. The family of the injured boy brought a claim against the water park alleging that the park did not have a sufficient number ... WebPresident of Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors Consultant, Partner at Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors View profile View profile …
We
WebOct 14, 2024 · Appellants Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. and Huggins Insurance Services, Inc. opening brief due 01/21/2024. Appellee Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company answering brief due 02/22/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11857792] (JBS) [Entered: 10/14/2024 … WebFeb 14, 2024 · Filed by Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc.. (Hoesly, Cody) February 14, 2024: Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6275548 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc., … derwent innovation patent family
Gardner et al v. Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. et al
WebBliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc offers business liability insurance for businesses and organizations as well as individual medical and life insurance. WebMay 17, 2024 · Real parties in interest Bliss Sequoia and Huggins Insurance (collectively, the brokers) helped a waterpark procure liability insurance with total policy limits of $5 million dollars. After the 2015 renewal of this policy, petitioners Peter and Christian Gardner's son visited the waterpark, nearly drowned, and sustained severe injuries. WebBliss Sequoia turned to Allied to defend and indemnify it against the family’s claims. When Allied denied coverage, Bliss Sequoia filed this action. 1 The family and the waterpark entered into a stipulated judgment in favor of the family in the amount of $49,000,000. Compl. Ex. C, 5. 3 – OPINION AND ORDER STANDARDS chrysanthemum instant tea powder