site stats

Gamboa vs teves summary

WebWILSON GAMBOA VS. TEVES GR 176579 June 21, 2011 DOCTRINE. No franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be … Webheirs of wilson p. gamboa,* petitioners, g.r. no. 176579 present: - versus - finance secretary margarito b. teves, finance undersecretary john p. sevilla, and commissioner ricardo …

EN BANC G.R. No. 176579 - Securities and Exchange …

WebHEIRS OF WILSON P. GAMBOA, * Petitioners, v. FINANCE SECRETARYMARGARITO B. TEVES, FINANCE UNDERSECRETARYJOHN P. SEVILLA, AND COMMISSIONER RICARDO ABCEDE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT(PCGG) IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS CHAIR AND MEMBERS, … WebApr 18, 2024 · Roy originally questioned the constitutionality of the SEC memorandum for not conforming to the spirit and letter of the following: the High Court’s decision in the case of Gamboa v. Teves ... u of i half marathon https://casathoms.com

Grandfather rule: A test for public utilities? Inquirer Business

WebJun 28, 2011 · Gamboa v. Teves etal., GR No. 176579, October 9, 2012 Summary: The issue started when petitioner Gamboa questioned the indirect sale of shares involving … Weben banc g.r. no. 176579, june 28, 2011 wilson p. gamboa, petitioner, vs. FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, FINANCE UNDERSECRETARY JOHN P. … Webwilson p. gamboa, petitioner, g.r. no. 176579 present: - versus - finance secretary margarito b. teves, finance undersecretary john p. sevilla, and commissioner ricardo abcede of the presidential commission on good government (pcgg) in their capacities as chair and members, respectively, of the privatization council, chairman anthoni salim of records that should be kept on shareholders

Gamboa v Teves - Case Digest - G. No. 176579 October 9, 2012

Category:5. Gamboa vs Teves - xsx - Today is Wednesday, March 29, 2024

Tags:Gamboa vs teves summary

Gamboa vs teves summary

Gamboa v. Teves - law - G. No. 176579. June 28, 2011.* WILSON

WebThe 111,415 PTIC shares, which represent about 46.125 percent of the outstanding capital stock of PTIC, were later declared by this Court to be owned by the Republic of the Philippines. Subsequently, these shares of stock were sold to foreign entity. As a result of such sale, the prohibition of the 1987 Constitution mandating that the capital of public … WebWILSON P. GAMBOA VS FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, ET AL. GR No. 176579 June 28, 2011 FACTS On 28 November 1928, the Philippine Legislature enacted Act No. 3436 which granted Philippine Long Distance Company (PLDT) a franchise and the right to engage in telecommunications business. In 1969, General Telephone …

Gamboa vs teves summary

Did you know?

WebJun 28, 2011 · HEIRS OF WILSON P. GAMBOA, Petitioners, vs. FINANCE SECRETARYMARGARITO B. TEVES, FINANCE UNDERSECRETARYJOHN P. SEVILLA, AND COMMISSIONER RICARDO ABCEDE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT(PCGG) IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS CHAIR AND MEMBERS, … WebJun 28, 2011 · HEIRS OF WILSON P. GAMBOA, Petitioners, vs. FINANCE SECRETARYMARGARITO B. TEVES, FINANCE UNDERSECRETARYJOHN P. …

WebSummary: The issue started when petitioner Gamboa questioned the indirect sale of shares involving almost 12 million shares of the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company …

Web20 Valle Verde vs Africa; 19 Gamboa vs Teves - CASE; 52. Lung Center vs QC - taxation 1; 13. GR 5387 - CASE; Department Order No. 2024-003; Preview text. ... ·In summary, it is our considered view, as we now so hereby express, that·(1) Jurisdiction over the person must be seasonably raised, i., that it is pleaded in a motion to dismiss or by ... WebMar 29, 2024 · The Court did not rule on the factual issues raised by Gamboa, except the single and purely legal issue on the definition of the term "capital" in Section 11, Article …

WebMay 22, 2013 · Not known to many, the Supreme Court rendered a sequel to Gamboa vs Teves, a 2011 decision affirmed in 2012, that defined the term “capital” for purposes of determining whether a public ...

WebThe facts, according to petitioner Wilson P. Gamboa, a stockholder of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT), are as follows: 1. On 28 November 1928, the … u of i high school band competitionWebTo repeat, the issue in the Gamboa Decision was "whether the term 'capital' in Section 11, Article XII of the Constitution refers to the total common shares only or to the total outstanding capital stock (combined total of common and non-voting preferred shares) of PLDT, a public utility." Considering PLDT's capital structure at the time, indicating that … u of i hepatologyWeb4 Yuchengco v. Sandiganbayan, G. No. 149802, 20 January 2006, 479 SCRA 1. 703. VOL. 652, JUNE 28, 2011 703 Gamboa vs. Teves ownership of PTIC will not violate the 40 percent constitutional limit on foreign ownership of a public utility since PTIC holds only 13 percent of the total outstanding common shares of PLDT. 5 On 28 u of i hawkeyes football scheduleWebApr 18, 2016 · In effect, the FIA clarifies, reiterates and confirms the interpretation that the term “capital” in Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution refers to shares with voting rights, as well as with full beneficial ownership. This is precisely because the right to vote in the election of directors, coupled with full beneficial ownership ... u of i health insuranceWeb4 Yuchengco v. Sandiganbayan, G. No. 149802, 20 January 2006, 479 SCRA 1. 703. VOL. 652, JUNE 28, 2011 703 Gamboa vs. Teves ownership of PTIC will not violate the 40 … u of i healthWebGAMBOA V. TEVES (G. NO. 176579; JUNE 28, 2011) CASE DIGEST: WILSON P. GAMBOA, Petitioner, vs. FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, PABLITO … records through ssnWebOct 9, 2012 · Gamboa vs. Teves, G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012 FACTS: The lawyers of PLDT felt that they were disadvantaged by this decision, because now it is not based on total outstanding stock, but on the common shares. They filed a Motion for Reconsideration brought by the foreigners and their lawyers who were insisting on the total outstanding … u of i hematology